This is the assignment for students XII IPA 1&2, XII Language Program and XII accelerated class
The following text is a review text, read carefully and give your comment about the writing. It is taken from cohttp://movies.nytimes.com/2008/03/15/movies/15doom.html
Questions
1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?
2. What did he evaluate?
3. Did he like the movie? Which paragraph supports your answer?
4. In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie?
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
The following text is a review text, read carefully and give your comment about the writing. It is taken from cohttp://movies.nytimes.com/2008/03/15/movies/15doom.html
Questions
1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?
2. What did he evaluate?
3. Did he like the movie? Which paragraph supports your answer?
4. In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie?
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
Doomsday (2008)
Confronting a Killer Epidemic That Wouldn’t Die
“If you’re hungry, here’s a piece of your friend,” snarls a jailer in the post-apocalyptic action picture “Doomsday,” sliding a plateful of charbroiled man-flesh to a captive.
If that line fails to make the film’s midnight-movie ambitions clear, the British writer and director Neil Marshall offers many other clues: hands, legs and heads lopped off in bloody close-ups; a nonstop soundtrack of adrenaline-stoking rock ’n’ roll; a shot of a cute little bunny blasted into rabbit stew by a remote-controlled sentry cannon.
“Doomsday” is set in the near future, years after the British government quarantined a plague-ravaged Scotland and let its inhabitants die out. The decision is believed to have killed the disease along with the Scottish population, but when it surfaces in London, officials reveal that a hardy band of Glasgow inhabitants survived the epidemic and might hold clues to a cure.
Enter the stoic, one-eyed mercenary Eden Sinclair (Rhona Mitra, of the television show “Nip/Tuck”), who is ostensibly entrusted with leading a team of soldiers into Glasgow on a mission to find a doctor-turned-political leader named Kane (Malcolm McDowell) and learn how the Glasgow contingent survived. Really, though, Eden is mainly on hand to impersonate another sci-fi hero, Snake Plissken from John Carpenter’s “Escape From New York,” and to punch, kick, run and shoot her way through situations shamelessly cribbed from Mr. Carpenter’s film, George Miller’s “Mad Max” trilogy, “Aliens” and other dystopian touchstones.
“Doomsday” has an appealing punk-rock sneer, but aside from a few clever music cues — including a Fine Young Cannibals song that accompanies a deranged bacchanal given by fine young cannibals — swagger is, unfortunately, its only notable quality.
The film’s bellowing, Mohawk-topped villain, Sol (Craig Conway), is a personality-free retread of Vernon Wells’s memorable Wez from “The Road Warrior.” Major supporting characters — including a squad leader, played by Adrian Lester, and a gruff yet caring boss, portrayed by Bob Hoskins — are so lifeless they could have been cast with inflatable dolls. The final chase, modeled on an epic set-piece from Mr. Miller’s second “Mad Max” movie, is likewise a bust, substituting gore, shaky camerawork and chop-chop editing for Mr. Miller’s symphonic build-up and release.
Mr. Marshall gained a cult following with his 2002 debut feature, “Dog Soldiers,” about British troops menaced by werewolves in the Scottish highlands, and acquired serious (and well-deserved) critical respect for his 2005 film, “The Descent,” about a group of female spelunkers who encounter terrifying creatures while exploring a network of caves.
In terms of story, “The Descent” and “Doomsday” are as different as two genre films can be, but the falloff in artistic quality is still quantifiable. Where “The Descent” was a slow, quiet, exquisitely modulated, startlingly original film, “Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
“Doomsday” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.
ok Mom, temen temen bisa kirim jawaban ke blog sma
ReplyDeletedi; www.sman1purwosari.co.cc
1. No he didn't to evaluate the weakness and the strenght.
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3. yes he did, paragraph 1
4. paragraph 2 - 6
5. more than 16 years old.
it is not easy to understand mom ....
Question :
ReplyDelete1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie ? yes, he did.
2. What did he evaluate ? Doomsday (a sci-fi film).
3. Did he like the movie ? no, he didn’t like. Which paragraph supports your answer ? 9th paragraph.
4. In which paragraph did the writer tell the story of the movie ? 4th paragraph.
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie ? after 17 ages.
1.yes the author wrote the weaknesses and strengths movie
ReplyDelete2. storyline, and the story of the film.
3.yes. in paragraph 2
4. 2 until 6
5.above 17 age
1. yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the story, he write the strengths and the weakness andhe compare Doomsday with another movie (The Descent)
3. no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4. 4th paragraph.
5. more than 17 ages.
1.Yes,He Did.
ReplyDelete2.The Writer tell us about the story, strengths and compare “Doomsday with Descent”
(In terms of story, “The Descent” and “Doomsday” are as different as two genre films can be, but the falloff in artistic quality is still quantifiable…….)
3.I think No,He did not like the Films.
(“Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
“Doomsday” It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence. )
4.In paragraph 2-6.
5.More than 17 years old.And Under 17 need control from parents.
1.yes, he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story movie and compared with another movie
3.yes in paragraph 2
4.paragraph 3 until 5
5.more than 17 years old
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.he evaluate about the weakness and strength of the movie and he compare the movie
3.no,in paragraph 8
4.in paragraph 3
5.under 17 requaire accompanying parent or adult guardian
1.Yes he did
ReplyDelete2.yes of course.he evaluate the weakness and the strength and compare of the movie
3.yes he did,paragraph 8In terms of story, “The Descent” and “Doomsday” are as different as two genre films can be, but the falloff in artistic quality is still quantifiable. Where “The Descent” was a slow, quiet, exquisitely modulated, startlingly original film, “Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke
4.in paragraph 3
“Doomsday” is set in the near future, years after the British government quarantined a plague-ravaged Scotland and let its inhabitants die out. The decision is believed to have killed the disease along with the Scottish population, but when it surfaces in London, officials reveal that a hardy band of Glasgow inhabitants survived the epidemic and might hold clues to a cure.
5.Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the story movie and compare it with another movie.
3. no, he didn't...in paragraph 8 until 9
4. 2 until 6
5. more than 17 years old and if under 17 years old need control from their parents.
arief rizal XII IA 1
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3.no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4.paragraph 2 until 6
5.17 above/teenagers
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he evaluated about the weakness of the movie and the strength of the movie
3.no. in paragraph 8
4. in paragraph 3
5. under 17 requires accompanyingparent or adult guardian.
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3.no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4.paragraph 2 until 6
5.17 above/teenagers
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3.no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4.paragraph 2 until 6
5.17 above/teenagers
Fandi Hermawan XII-IA 2/14
ReplyDelete1.No, he didn't.
2.He evaluated about the point review of the story, such as the figure, the music and the comparasion with other film.
3.Yes he did, In paragraph two.
4.In the paragraph three and four.
5.Seventeen age and above.
ANSWER
ReplyDelete1.No,he didn't
2.he evaluated about the point of the story
3.yes,he did.(In paragraph 2)
4.in paragraph 3 & 4
5.seventeen above/teenager
Ardyani Eka Y. XII-IA 1/18
ReplyDelete1.Yes, he did.
2.He evaluated the strength of the movie but the weakness isn't stated in the review.
3.Yes. he did. In the paragraph 2.
4.In the paragraph 3 until 5.
5.More than 17 age.
1. YES, he evaluated the weakness and the strenght.
ReplyDelete2. he evaluated about the story of the movie,the strenght and the weakness and the diferent with another movie.
3. no, he didn't like the movie, in paragraph 8 - 9
4. in paragraph 3 till 7
5. more than 17 years old and if under 17 years old need control from their parents.
Andi Syaifur R. / XII IPA 1
1. Yes he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the point review of the story, such as the figure, the music and the comparasion with other film.
3. no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4. in paragraph 2-6
5. under 17 requaire accompanying parent or adult guardian
1. Yes he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3. .Yes. he did. In the paragraph 2.
4. In paragraph 3 and 4
5. More than 17 years old.
1)Yes, he did
ReplyDelete2)He evaluates the weaknesses and strengths as well as the contents of the film and talk about other movies that have the same theme
3)no,he didn't like because Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
4)in paragraph 3-6
5)more than 17 years old
Questions and answer!!!!
ReplyDelete1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie? yes, he did
2. What did he evaluate? the story of doomsday, he compare this movie with another movie
3. Did he like the movie? Which paragraph supports your answer? no, he didn't
in paragraph 8
4. In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie? paragraph 3 until paragraph 5
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
more than 17 years old
1. Yes,he did
ReplyDelete2. The authors are evaluating the strengths of the film but the weakness in the film still has not been clarified, the authors also compare the film with other films .
3. I think No,He did not like the Films.
“Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
“Doomsday” It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.
4. in paragraph 2 UNTIL 6
5. I think 18 years old
1.Yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.He evaluated about story, and he explain about the streght and the weakness of the movie
3.Yes,he did.He tell about it in paragraph 8
4.In paragraph 3-5
5.more than 17 years old(adult)
1.Yes, he did
ReplyDelete2.He evaluates the weaknesses and strengths as well as the contents of the film and he compares with other films that have a similar theme. And he also mentioned that there are few players in the movie.
3.No,he didn't. The reasons that support contained in paragraphs 8 and 9. (“Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
“Doomsday” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.)
4.In paragraphs 3 until 6
5.More than 17 years old.
Dianny Parmudhita Harini/XII IA.1/38
ReplyDelete1. no, he didn't
2. just tell about the point review of the story .
3. no, paragraph 8
4. in paragraph 2 until 5
5. 17 years old
1. yes,he did .
ReplyDelete2. he compares with other films that have a
similar theme.
3. yes,he did .
in the paragraph 8 .
4. in paragraph 2 until 6 .
5. 17 years old .
Questions and answer!!!!
ReplyDelete1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?
yes ,he did
2. What did he evaluate?
He evaluate about the story of this movie “doomsday”
3. Did he like the movie?no,he didn’t
Which paragraph supports your answer?in paragraph 8
“doomsday is frenetic,loud,wildly imprecise,and soderivative that is......”
4. In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie?
Paragraph 3 until paragraph 5
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
above 17 years” ( Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian).it includes nudity,bad language and extreme violence.”
1.) No,he didn't,
ReplyDelete2.) he evaluated about the story of the movie,the strenght and the weakness and the diferent with another movie.
3.) No, he didn't. . .in paragraph 8,
4.) In paragraphs 3 until 6,
5.) I think more than 17 years old and above 17 years must be supervision with the parents.
-XII_LP / 21
Question and Answer
ReplyDelete1. yes, he did
2. He evaluate the weakness and strength of "doomsday" movie
3. yes, he did, in paragraph 5
4. paragraph 3 - 5
5. more than 17 years
1.Yes he did
ReplyDelete2.he evaluated about the weakness of the movie and the strength of the movie that have simillar theme,and mentioned the players in the movie
3.No he didn't,The reasons that support contained in paragraphs 8-9 that the doomsday movie is hard, was dishonorable and bad language.
4.in paragraph 3 until 7
5.more than 17 years old
1. Yes he did.
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3. No, he didn’t liked the movies, it contained
in paragraph 8.
4. In the paragraph 3 until paragraph 5.
5. The suitable ages to see the movie are
17 up years or more than 17 years.
1. Yes he did.
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the weakness and
strength of the movie ,and characters,
sound track,etc.
3. No, he didn’t liked the movies,the reasons in
last paragraph ( paragraph 8 )
4. In paragraphs 3 until 5.
5. The suitable ages are 17+ years old
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluat about weakness and
strength of the movie
3.yes,he did in paragraph 2
4.in paragraph 2 and 3
5.I think more than 17 years old
1. Yes he avaluate the movie at 5th & 8th paragraph.
ReplyDelete2. The weakness and the excess of the Doomsday movie.
3. No he didn't at 8th Paragraph.
4. at 3th paragraph until 5th paragraph.
5. the suitable ages which can see the movie is more than 17 years old.
1)Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?
ReplyDeleteanswer : yes,he did
2)What did he evaluate?
answer : he evaluates the weaknesses and strengths of the movie and talk about other movies that have the similiar theme.
3)Did he like the movie?Which paragraph supports your answer?
answer : No,he didn't like.in paragraph 8 until 9.
(8)In terms of story, “The Descent” and “Doomsday” are as different as two genre films can be, but the falloff in artistic quality is still quantifiable. Where “The Descent” was a slow, quiet, exquisitely modulated, startlingly original film, “Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
(9)“Doomsday” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.
4)In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie?
answer : in paragraph 2,4,5
(2)If that line fails to make the film’s midnight-movie ambitions clear, the British writer and director Neil Marshall offers many other clues: hands, legs and heads lopped off in bloody close-ups; a nonstop soundtrack of adrenaline-stoking rock ’n’ roll; a shot of a cute little bunny blasted into rabbit stew by a remote-controlled sentry cannon.
(4)Enter the stoic, one-eyed mercenary Eden Sinclair (Rhona Mitra, of the television show “Nip/Tuck”), who is ostensibly entrusted with leading a team of soldiers into Glasgow on a mission to find a doctor-turned-political leader named Kane (Malcolm McDowell) and learn how the Glasgow contingent survived. Really, though, Eden is mainly on hand to impersonate another sci-fi hero, Snake Plissken from John Carpenter’s “Escape From New York,” and to punch, kick, run and shoot her way through situations shamelessly cribbed from Mr. Carpenter’s film, George Miller’s “Mad Max” trilogy, “Aliens” and other dystopian touchstones.
(5)The film’s bellowing, Mohawk-topped villain, Sol (Craig Conway), is a personality-free retread of Vernon Wells’s memorable Wez from “The Road Warrior.” Major supporting characters — including a squad leader, played by Adrian Lester, and a gruff yet caring boss, portrayed by Bob Hoskins — are so lifeless they could have been cast with inflatable dolls. The final chase, modeled on an epic set-piece from Mr. Miller’s second “Mad Max” movie, is likewise a bust, substituting gore, shaky camerawork and chop-chop editing for Mr. Miller’s symphonic build-up and release.
5)After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
answer : who can watch are those over the age of 17 years.
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluate about the story of "Doomsday", about the weakness and strength of the movie, and he also compare this movie with another movie.
3. no, he didn't. (on paragraph 8)
4. in paragraph 3 until 5
5. more than 17 yers old
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3. no, he didnt
The paragraph which support it is 8 and 9
4. paragraph 3-6
5. above 17 years old
Dessy Aini F/ XII-IA 1
ReplyDelete1.Yes, He did
2. He evaluate about story, strength and the weakness of the story
3.No he didn't, in paragraph 8 and 9 "“Doomsday” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence."
4.in paragraph 3 until 5
5.more than 17 years
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2 He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3. no, he didnt
The paragraph which support it is 8 and 9
4. paragraph 3 until 6
5. more than 17 years old
1.yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. tell about the point review of doomsday .
3.no he didn’t, in paragraph 8
4.in paragfar 3-5
5.more than 17 years old
1.yes,he did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie
ReplyDelete2.he evaluates the content of films, stories and excess film
3.no,he ddn't
4.in paragraph 3 until paragraph 6
5.After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
above 17 years old
1. Yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. About weakness and the strength of the movie
3. Yes, paragraph 8
4. 2 until 5
5. More than 17 years old
answer:
ReplyDelete1. yes he did
2. >the different between "doomsday" film with another mr.marshall's film that is "the descent"
>the weakness of the movie for adolescents under 17 years
>the caracter soundtrack of the movie
3. no he didn't(he didn't told)
4. in paragraph 2-3
5. above 17 years old(under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian)
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3. no, he didn’t and The paragraph which support it is 8 and 9
4. paragraph 3-6
5. above 17 years old
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3. no, he didn’t and The paragraph which support it is 8 and 9
4. paragraph 3-6
5. above 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2.about the story of doomsday and compare with another movie (the descent)
3.no he didn't
4.in paragraph 2-3
5.above 17 years old
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3. no, he didn’t and The paragraph which support it is 8 and 9
4. paragraph 3-6
5. above 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3.no he didn't (par 8 and 9)
4.par.2-5
5.above 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2. the different between "doomsday" film with another mr.marshall's film that is "the descent"
.the soundtrack of the movie
3.no he didn't
4.par.2-3
5.more than 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2. compare the doomsday movie and the descent
.the movie soundtrack
3.no he didn't
4.par.2-3
5.more than 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2. .about the story of doomsday and compare with another movie (the descent)
3.no he didn't
4.par.2-3
5.more than 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2. >the different between "doomsday" film with film "the descent"
>the weakness of the movie for adolescents under 17 years
>the movie soundtrack
3. no he didn't(he didn't told)
4. in paragraph 2-3
5. above 17 years old(under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian)
1.yes he did
ReplyDelete2.compare the doomsday movie and descent
3.no he didn't
4.paragraph 2-3
5.more than 17 years old
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2.about the story of doomsday and compare with another movie (the descent)
3.no he didn't
4.in paragraph 2-3
5.above 17 years old
1.yes he did
ReplyDelete2.compare the doomsday movie and descent
3.no he didn't
4.paragraph 2-3
5.more than 17 years old
Aulia Hasni Nairi (12 IPA 1)
ReplyDelete1.yes ,he did
2.he evaluate about the weakness and the strength and he compare with another movie
3.no,he didn't
4.paragraph 2 until 6
5.over 17 years old and if under 17 years need control from their parents
Questions
ReplyDelete1. Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?.
No he didn’t
2. What did he evaluate?
.About characteristic, genre, the soundtrack and the plot
3. Did he like the movie? Which paragraph supports your answer?
.No he didn’t , 5th
4. In which paragraphs did the writer tell the story of the movie?
.3th
5. After reading the text, what ages are suitable to see that movie?
.Under 17 accompanied by parent or adult guardian
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. yes,he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the weakness and the strength
the movie and compare it with onother movie
3. no, he didn't
in paragraph 8th and 9th
4. in paragraph 2nd until 6th
5. over 17 years old and if under 17 years old
need control by their parents
Diego Seno P XII IA 1
ReplyDelete1. yes,he did
2. he tell about the weakness and the strength
the movie and compare it with onother movie
3. no, he didn't. paragraph 8th and 9th
4. paragraph 2nd until 6th
5. over 17 years old and if under 17 years old
need control from their parents
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he evaluate the strength and weakness of this film and compare the film with"The descents"
3. no, he didn't,we can see from paragraph 8th until 9th
4. paragraph 2nd until 3rd
5. above 17 years old and if under 17 years old
need control from their parents
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he evaluated background music, visual appearance,of "doomsday" movie. and beside that he evaluated feature between "doomsday" and "the descent" movie.
3. no, he didn't...
in paragraph 8-9
4. in paragraph 3-4
5. more than 17 years old
Fike tsaniyah
ReplyDelete12 ipa2
Doomsday
1.yes he did
2.-the sountract of film
- action on film
- plot of the story
3.nO,he didn't,in pAragrApH 8 ". . . . .dErivative that it doesn't so much seem to reference its antecedents. . . ."
4.paragraph 4
5. 17 years old or more (adult)
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3. Yes, paragraph 8
4. 2 until 5
5. More than 17 years old
wiwit dwi
XII.BHS/38
1.yes, he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell the story of doomsday and compare with the descent
3.yes, he did, in paragraph 5
4.In paragraphs 3 until 6,
5.I think more than 17 years old and above 17 years must be supervision with the parents.
wulan cahya ningsih
XII.BHS/39
1.Yes he did
ReplyDelete2.He told me about this film and the difference with other movies
3.No he didn’t like film (In terms of story, “The Descent” and “Doomsday” are as different as two genre films can be, but the falloff in artistic quality is still quantifiable. Where “The Descent” was a slow, quiet, exquisitely modulated, startlingly original film, “Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
“Doomsday” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.)
4.Paragraph 2 until paragraph 6
5.More than 17 ages
1.Yes he did
ReplyDelete2.He tells about the movie storyline and differences with other movies
3.I think he didn’t like the movie
“The Descent” was a slow, quiet, exquisitely modulated, startlingly original film, “Doomsday” is frenetic, loud, wildly imprecise and so derivative that it doesn’t so much seem to reference its antecedents as try on their famous images like a child playing dress-up. Homage without innovation isn’t homage, it’s karaoke.
It includes nudity, bad language and extreme violence.
4.Paragraph 2-6
5.More than 17 ages (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian).
1. Yes , He did .
ReplyDelete2. He tell about the story movie and compared with another movie .
3. No, He didn’t liked the movies , it contained
in paragraph 8 .
Nurma Ardike Yunita
XII-LP
4. in paragraph 3 until paragraph 5 .
5. more than 17 years .
1. Yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. He tell about weakness and the strength of the movie.
3. No, he didn’t,
the paragraph which support it is 8 and 9.
4. In paragraphs 3 – 6.
5. Above 17 years old.
1. Yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. He tell about weakness and the strength of the movie.
3. No, he didn’t,
the paragraph which support it is 8 and 9.
4. In paragraphs 3 – 6.
5. Above 17 years old.
1. Yes , He did .
ReplyDelete2. The story tells about movie .
3. Yes , He did
4. Paragraph 3 until 5 .
5. More than 17 years .
1. Yes, He did
ReplyDelete2 He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3. No, he didnt, the proof in paragraph 8 and 9.
4. In paragraphs 3 until 6.
5. The suitable ages are 17+ years old
1. Yes , he did
ReplyDelete2. He tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie .
3. No , he diddn't liked the movies, it contained
in paragraph 8 .
4. Paragraph 3 until paragraph 5 .
5. More than 17 years .
Nurma Ardike Yunita
XII-LP
1. Yes he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3. Yes he did
4. In paragraph 3 until paragaph 5
5. more than 17 years old
1. Yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. He tell about weakness and the strength of the movie.
3. No, he didn’t,
the paragraph which support it is 8 and 9.
4. In paragraphs 3 – 6.
5. Above 17 years old.
1. Yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. He tell about weakness and the strength of the movie.
3. No, he didn’t,
the paragraph which support it is 8 and 9.
4. In paragraphs 3 – 6.
5. Above 17 years old.
1.Yes , He did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story of the movie and compare with another movie
3.No he didn’t ( in par.8)
4.In paragraph 3 until paragraph 5
5.More than 17 years
Nurma Ardike Yunita
XII - LP
1.yes,he did.
ReplyDelete2.He tell about weakness and the strength of the movie.
3.yes,he did.
4.paragraph 3-5
5.more than 17 years old
1. yes,he did
ReplyDelete2. He evaluates the weaknesses and strengths as well as the contents of the film and he compares with other films that have a similar theme. And he also mentioned that there are few players in the movie.
3. Yes, he did
4. in paragraph 3 until paragraph 5
5. More than 17 years old
dini dwi iriani/40/12 IA 1
ReplyDelete1.yes,he did
2.he evaluates this film by comparing with other films
3.no, he didn’t and supporting paragraphs are paragraphs 8 and 9
4.pargraph 2 until 6
5.over the age of seventeen years
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2. he tell about the strength and the weakness of the movie.,
3. yes, he did
4. in paragraph 3-5
5. more than 17 years old
1. Yes he did
ReplyDelete2. He tell about the strengths and the weakness and the compare Doomsday with another movie “The Descent”
3. No he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph
4. 4th paragraph
5. 17+
1. yes,he Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie
ReplyDelete2. He evaluated about the weakness and the
strength of the movie ,about the characters
sound track, and compare that movie with
the other movies.
3.yes,he did
4.In paragraphs 3 until 6 the writer tell the story in the movie
5.more than 17 years old and above 17 years must be supervision with the parents.
Dewi Yuni Farida Sari
ReplyDeleteXII-IA 1
34
1.Yes , He did
2.The story tell about a movie
3.No he didn't ( in paragraph 8 )
4.Paragraph 2 until paragraph 5
5.more than 17 years.
1.Yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.The story tell about the strengh and the weakness.
3.Yes.he did
4.In paragraphs 3 until paragraph 5
5.More than 16 years old
NB;I'm sorry Mam,,,I'm late...
1. yes, he did.
ReplyDelete2. he evaluates advantages and disadvantages of the film.
3. no, he did. in the 8th and 9th paragraph.
4. in paragraph 2 until paragraph 5.
5. more than 17 years old.
:)
chikmatul islamiyah
ReplyDeletex11 ipa 1
27
1.Did the writer evaluate the weakness and the strength of the movie?
yes ,he did
2. What did he evaluate?
He evaluate about the story of this movie “doomsday”
3. No, he didn’t liked the movies, it contained
in paragraph 8.
4. In the paragraph 3 until paragraph 5.
5. The suitable ages to see the movie are
17 up years or more than 17 years.
Atik Yuliana
ReplyDeleteXII IA I /20
1.Yes he did
2.yes of course.he evaluate the weakness and the strength and compare of the movie
3. No he didn't at 8th Paragraph.
4.In the paragraph 3 until 5.
5.More than 17 age.
1.yes,he did
ReplyDelete2.he evaluate about the weakness and strength of the movie and he compare the movie
3.no,in paragraph 8
4.in paragraph 3
5.under 17 requaire accompanying parent or adult guardian
1. yes he did
ReplyDelete2. compare the doomsday movie and the descent
.the movie soundtrack
3.no he didn't
4.paragraph 2-3
5.more than 17 years old
1.Yes he did
ReplyDelete2.He evaluates the weaknesses and strengths as well as the contents of the film and he compares with other films that have a similar theme. And he also mentioned that there are few players in the movie.
3.no he didn't(he didn't told)
4.paragraph 3-6
5. above 17 years old
Batrilatul Mufida IA 1 1.yes he did
ReplyDelete2.hE evaluates the weakness and streng and compare the movie
3.no he didn, not at 8 th paraghraph.
4.3 until 5.
5.more than 17 old
BATRILATUL MUFIDA IA 1 Once upon a time there lived an unhappy young girl. Her mother was dead and her father had married a widow with two daughters. Her stepmother didn’t like her one little bit. All her kind thoughts and loving touches were for her own daughters. Nothing was too good for them – dresses, shoes, delicious food, soft beds, and every home comfort.
ReplyDeleteBut, for the poor unhappy girl, there was nothing at all. No dresses, only her stepsisters’ hand-me-downs. No lovely dishes, nothing but scraps. No rest and no comfort. She had to work hard all day. Only when evening came was she allowed to sit for a while by the fire, near the cinders. That’s why everybody called her Cinderella.
Cinderella used to spend long hours all alone talking to the cat. The cat said, . Miaow. , which really meant, . Cheer up! You have something neither of your stepsisters has and that is beauty.. It was quite true. Cinderella, even dressed in old rags, was a lovely girl. While her stepsisters, no matter how splendid and elegant their clothes, were still clumsy, lumpy and ugly and always would be.
One day, beautiful new dresses arrived at the house. A ball was to be held at the palace and the stepsisters were getting ready to go. Cinderella didn’t even dare ask if she could go too. She knew very well what the answer would be: . You? You’re staying at home to wash the dishes, scrub the floors and turn down the beds for your stepsisters. They will come home tired and very sleepy.. Cinderella sighed, . Oh dear, I’m so unhappy!. and the cat murmured . Miaow..
Suddenly something amazing happened. As Cinderella was sitting all alone, there was a burst of light and a fairy appeared. . Don’t be alarmed, Cinderella,. said the fairy. . I know you would love to go to the ball. And so you shall!. . How can I, dressed in rags?. Cinderella replied. . The servants will turn me away!.
The fairy smiled. With a flick of her magic wand Cinderella found herself wearing the most beautiful dress she had ever seen. . Now for your coach,. said the fairy; “A real lady would never go to a ball on foot! Quick! Get me a pumpkin!. . Oh of course,. said Cinderella, rushing away. Then the fairy turned to the cat. . You, bring me seven mice, and, remember they must be alive!.
Cinderella soon returned with the pumpkin and the cat with seven mice he had caught in the cellar. With a flick of the magic wand the pumpkin turned into a sparkling coach and the mice became six white horses, while the seventh mouse turned into a coachman in a smart uniform and carrying a whip. Cinderella could hardly believe her eyes.
inderella had a wonderful time at the ball until she heard the first stroke of midnight! She remembered what the fairy had said, and without a word of goodbye she slipped from the Prince. s arms and ran down the steps. As she ran she lost one of her slippers, but not for a moment did she dream of stopping to pick it up! If the last stroke of midnight were to sound… oh… what a disaster that would be! Out she fled and vanished into the night.
he Prince, who was now madly in love with her, picked up the slipper and said to his ministers, “Go and search everywhere for the girl whose foot this slipper fits. I will never be content until I find her!”
So the ministers tried the slipper on the foot of every girl in the land until only Cinderella was left.
That awful untidy girl simply cannot have been at the ball,. snapped the stepmother. . Tell the Prince he ought to marry one of my two daughters! Can’t you see how ugly Cinderella is?. But, to everyone. s amazement, the shoe fitted perfectly.
Suddenly the fairy appeared and waved her magic wand. In a flash, Cinderella appeared in a splendid dress, shining with youth and beauty. Her stepmother and stepsisters gaped at her in amazement, and the ministers said, “Come with us Cinderella! The Prince is waiting for you.” So Cinderella married the Prince and lived happily ever. As for the cat, he just said “Miaow!”
moral value:true love is real
1. yes, he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story, he write the strengths and the weakness andhe compare Doomsday with another movie (The Descent)
3. no, he didn’t like. 8th and 9th paragraph.
4.In paragraphs 3 until 6,
5.I think more than 17 years old and above 17 years must be supervision with the parents.
1.yes, he did
ReplyDelete2.he tell about the story movie and compared with another movie
3.yes in paragraph 2
4.paragraph 3 until 5
5.more than 17 years old
1.yes ,he did
ReplyDelete2.he evaluate about the weakness and the strength and he compare with another movie
3.no,he didn't
4.paragraph 2 until 6
5.over 17 years old and if under 17 years need control from their parents